Supreme Court allows more relatives of US residents to enter pending final ruling on Trump travel ban
By
David
23 July 2017 (Edited )
Share This Article
New York Times
By
![](https://www.tourismmarketer.com/articles/attachments/avatars/thumb_30x15_b1fbee1fe292c1906ad67b00ce21c7da.jpg)
23 July 2017 (Edited )
Share This Article
New York Times
![David Boggs President/CEO ACRO Global|Publisher Tourism Marketer](https://www.tourismmarketer.com/images/dhb-100x100-tp.png)
David H. Boggs
President/CEO
ACRO Global
Publisher
TourismMarketer
ACRO Global
Publisher
TourismMarketer
Follow @davidhboggs
![Google Certifications - David H Boggs](https://www.tourismmarketer.com/images/google-certifications2.png)
Website | |
Rating | Show Individual Votes |
Views | 184 views. Averaging 184 views per day. |
Related Articles |
Senior Member
Usergroup: Administrator
Joined: 30 January 2012
Location: New England USA Web: DavidHBoggs.com
Total Articles: 2758
Total Comments: 498
The Trump administration's initial interpretation of the Supreme Court's ruling letting the travel ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen stand pending a final ruling was that persons having "bona fide" relationships with US residents were limited to parents, children, spouses, parents-in-law, sons- and daughters-in-law, people engaged to be married and siblings.
Subsequently, Honolulu Federal District Court Judge Derrick Watson ruled that "close family members be defined to include grandparents," and the Supreme Court has permitted that ruling to stand for now.